The Morning Edition (June 6, 2013)
From Last Night:
- The Mariners and White Sox take a 0-0 game into the 14th, each score 5, but the Sox win it in 16
- CarGo hits 3 HR and Tulo hits 2 HR as the Rockies smash the Reds
- Byrd homers twice to back a solid outing by Gee over the Nats
- Dickey helps his own cause at the plate and nearly misses a CGSO
- Hamels finally looks like Hamels, striking out 11 Marlins
- Sabathia gives up 4, but gets the CG win against the Indians
- Teheran nearly no-hits the Pirates
What I’m Watching Today:
- Lester and Holland duel in Boston (7p Eastern)
- Shelby Miller faces the Dbacks, looks to earn Appointment Television title in the process (8p Eastern)
- Greinke tries to straighten out against the Braves (10p Eastern)
The Big Question:
- Who will populate the top picks in today’s draft?
While there is plenty of exciting baseball on today, the MLB Draft will take center stage for most die hard fans. Unlike the NFL Draft, the MLB version doesn’t turn itself into an entire season in and of itself, but rather calls attention to itself in more subtle and sophisticated ways. Only a handful of mock drafts are done and only the first two rounds get airtime. A few names to know for the first pick are Mark Appel, Jonathan Gray, Kris Bryant, and Colin Moran, but it still remains unclear as to who the Astros will take first overall. I’m hoping for the Tar Heel, Moran, not because he’s the best, but because I’m a grad student at UNC and am hoping he drops several hundred dollars on his way back from signing the contract. If you’re new to the process, the key difference between the MLB Draft and others is that MLB teams are always drafting the best player available and do not focus on their current positional needs. NFL picks are expected to contribute right away, but MLB picks go through a seasoning process. For example, the Tigers will take a 3B with their pick if he’s the best player left even though they have a big of a logjam at the position. If you’re looking for a primer on the top picks, I suggest Mark Anderson’s work at BPN:
The Morning Edition (June 5, 2013)
From Last Night:
- Boston beats Texas 17-5, but David Murphy (the OF) pitches a scoreless inning
- The Braves walk off in extras against the Pirates
- Zimmermann is sharp and the Nats rally in the 9th to win
- Mayberry Jr. walks off in grand style against the Fish
- Both Wacha and Skaggs struggle as the Cards and Dbacks go down to the wire
- The Mariners bounce Peavy early
What I’m Watching Today:
- Turner and Hamels at Citizens’ Bank (1p Eastern)
- Garza faces the Angels (7p Eastern)
- Kershaw gets the Padres at home (10p Eastern)
The Big Question:
- What should we make of last night’s steroid story?
The big story last night was that MLB has acquired the cooperation of fake doctor/steroid peddler Tony Bosch and will attempt to use his testimony to suspend up to 20 MLB players who appear on documents relating to Bosch’s Miami clinic, including Alex Rodriguez and Ryan Braun.
Now I’m not condoning cheating, but I do question the way this investigation is being handled. I think a failed test that holds up to the scrutiny of the review process should land players on the suspended list, but the evidence that is publicly available on this clinic is not very convincing. If MLB is going to base suspensions on Bosch’s word and some hand written notes, that isn’t okay. Most of these players haven’t failed a test and the ones who have failed a test have already served a suspension. I’m all for strict testing and harsh punishments, but I don’t think the evidence is very compelling. Additionally, this is not really news. MLB has been trying to suspend these guys from the start. The only new information is that Bosch is now cooperating, but the headlines focused on the desire to suspend. This is definitely a case of the media (ESPN in particular) making more out of a story than they should. A big steroid suspension is big news, but that isn’t what we got last night. We got “MLB is working to suspend them.” Sorry guys, wake me when something is happening. Let’s focus on the MLB draft and ASG and regular season until something actually happens.
Dynamic Standings Projection (June 5, 2013)
In case you missed it, in April we launched our Dynamic Standings Projection feature on New English D. A full explanation of the methodology can be found here or by clicking the tab at the top of the page. This project seeks to provide a reasoned and cautious approach to updating our beliefs about the baseball future. You can find a summarization of the original projections here. You’ll notice a column on the far right that indicates the difference in projected wins from the preseason prediction. Positive numbers mean teams are now projected to win more games and negative numbers mean a team is now projected to win fewer games. You’ll notice a series of graphs below the standings section that track how the projections have evolved over the course of the year.
This Dynamic Standings Projection is updated through the June 4 games.
The Morning Edition (June 4, 2013)
From Last Night:
- Molina and Beltran homer to back Lynn against the Snakes
- Medlen shines as Burnett stumbles
- Arroyo goes 8 scoreless to beat the Rox
- Kendrick hits a 3B and goes the distance to beat the Fish
What I’m Watching Today:
- Zimmermann faces the Mets in DC (7p Eastern)
- Moore and Sanchez in Detroit (7p Eastern)
- Skaggs and Wacha make prospect hounds drool in STL (8p Eastern)
- Peavy and Felix out west (10p Eastern)
The Big Question:
- What should the All-Star Game be?
Someone on Twitter asked Keith Law if Matt Carpenter should be an All-Star, which Law disagreed with because
https://twitter.com/keithlaw/status/341747971655872512
I’m curious what other people think, but I like when the All-Star game features a mix of star players and lesser known guys having good opening months. I understand his argument is that MLB wants to showcase the stars to expand the popularity of the sport, but I think national media events should be a time for the sport to turn its unsung players into stars. I don’t like when ESPN and Fox only talk about Jeter and Sabathia and Big Papi. National forums should be a chance to put guys like Matt Carpenter (2.5 WAR) and Josh Donaldson (2.6 WAR) on display. “Hey look, here are some guys you might not get a chance to see a lot who are playing great!” I like that aspect of it. The game will have Miguel Cabrera and Buster Posey, but I think it should also have the unknowns because it should be a game for die hard fans as well as casual fans who often use the word “boring” to describe baseball.
The Morning Edition (June 3, 2013)
From Last Night:
- Jeremy Bonderman’s return doesn’t go well, gives up 7 ER in 4.2 to the Twins
- The Angels lose their 3rd straight to the Astros fall to 25-32
- Darvish narrowly outduels Santana, but has to sweat as his bullpen nearly costs them
- The Dbacks back Corbin’s 9th W
- Lee Ks 11 in 7.2 innings to beat the Crew
- Dusty waits to use his closer and it costs him a win against the Pirates
- The Fish hit Harvey and sweep the Mets
- The Rays rough up the Indians
What I’m Watching Today:
- Masterson vs Pettitte in NY (7p Eastern)
- Burnett and Medlen face off in Atlanta (7p Eastern)
- Under the radar Cahill and Lynn draw each other at Busch (8p Eastern)
The Big Question:
- How will Puig do in his MLB debut?
If you follow me on Twitter or were an early regular at New English D, you know I was very invested in Jeremy Bonderman’s comeback today. It didn’t go well. Because the Tigers were in Baltimore I had to have the Tigers on the radio, which gave me a chance to watch Bonderman on television. He had a fastball from 89-92 and a good slider at times, and he struck out the first batter he faced and delivered a 1-2-3 first inning. If you followed his career as a Tiger, you know the first inning gave him nightmares. But from there it unraveled as he allowed 3 runs in the 2nd and 2 runs in each of the 4th and 5th innings before being removed from the game. He struck out just one batter. He actually kept the ball down and had decent movement on his pitches, but without a good offspeed pitch, it’s hard to be successful as a starter if you don’t have a big fastball. It sounds like he’ll get another shot in five days, but if nothing else, he made it back to the big leagues. I’ll always be rooting for him even if he doesn’t have much left. He has something left.
The Morning Edition (June 2, 2013)
From Last Night:
- Ubaldo goes 8 scoreless to beat the Rays
- The Twins walk off on the Mariners
- Miller throws 7 scoreless, Wainwright goes the distance and allows one run as the Cards sweep the Giants in a DH
- Oakland literally walks off against the Sox
- Rockies walk off on the Dodgers
What I’m Watching Today:
- Matt Harvey faces the Marlins, expect strikeouts (1p Eastern)
- Cliff Lee goes against the Crew (130p Eastern)
- Jeremy Bonderman is back on an MLB mound against the Twins (2p Eastern)
- Corbin gets the Cubs (2p Eastern)
- Darvish toes the slab against the Royals (3p Eastern)
- Buchholz and Kuroda in NY (8p Eastern)
The Big Question:
- Does playing a different position really affect you at the plate?
You may have heard recently that Mike Trout is crushing at the plate again after his early season slump because he’s back in CF while Bourjos is on the DL. I’ve got to say, this is silly. Very. I could buy the argument if he was struggling when playing a more difficult position. For example, if you move from 1B to 3B and struggle at the plate because you have to work on your defense, that could make sense. But Trout was moving to an easier spot, why would that affect him? It wouldn’t. He’s a world class 21 year old athlete coming off a crazy good season. It’s nonsense to think he was affected at the plate by a position change that put him in a spot that was too easy. Ken Rosenthal has led the way on this topic and points to this split:
Trout 2013 as LF:.247/.327/.412
Trout 2013 as CF: .324/.400/.632
But that’s normal variation. Rosenthal and others just saw it and went for it as something to write about to gin up controversy. Here’s how I know:
Trout 2012 as LF: .326/.395/.645
Trout 2012 as CF: .329/.404/.542
If Trout was affected psychologically by playing out of position, why didn’t affect him last season? This is random noise in his production over the course of the season that happened to correlate with a teammates injury. Want better evidence?
Trout 2013 in Odd Numbered Games: .401 OBP
Trout 2013 in Even Numbered Games: .339 OBP
Look, Mike Trout is better during odd numbered games. The Angels should sit him today. Give me a break.
MLB Power Rankings June 2013
Before the season began, I provided you with how I thought the season would play out in standings form and in power rankings form (30-21, 20-11, 10-1). Each week, I’ve updated the standings projection based on the games from the previous week, and at the beginning of every month, have synthesized that into league-wide power rankings. What follows are my MLB Power Rankings for June 2013. (You can find May’s here.)
The idea is simple. I ranked the teams at the beginning of the season based on how well I thought they would perform over the entire season. I am doing the same thing here, but I just have new information to include based on a months worth of games and injuries.
30. Miami Marlins (May Ranking: 30)
The Marlins are on pace for fewer wins than the 2003 Tigers and currently have the league’s worst offensive by wRC+ and WAR and the 6th worst pitching staff by WAR. As a team they are hitting .221/.281/.316. That line isn’t really isn’t good enough to stay in the major leagues as a bench player unless you’re a great defender. The Marlins are terrible and not in a hopeful way like the Astros.
29. Houston Astros (29)
The Astros have the 9th worst offense in the league and 2nd worst pitching staff, but they do have an air of decency surrounding them. They have something to prove, while the Marlins have nothing for which to live. Neither team is any good, but the Astros are better in my book.
28. Minnesota Twins (27)
The Twins have a bad offense, a bad defense, and mediocre pitching that is performing above and beyond what it is probably capable of for an entire season. The sum total of their position players (2.3 WAR) has been dragged above zero entirely by their best player, Joe Mauer (2.3 WAR). The Twins aren’t the abject failures that the Marlins are, and they have some major league level talent, but they’re nowhere near good.
27. San Diego Padres (26)
I was mildly bullish on the Padres entering the season, figuring they could hit well enough to hang around .500 with some solid pitching. Well, the offense has actually done the job (97 wRC+), but the pitching has been the worst in baseball (-2.7 WAR) with a really terrible FIP (4.56) despite playing half their games in Petco Park.
26. Seattle Mariners (24)
The Mariners’ ranks (18th best offense, 13th best pitching) probably deserve a higher spot on this list, but I can’t do it. Kyle Seager is a solid player and Kendrys Morales is having a nice bounce back year, but when those two guys are your offensive studs, it’s probably going to be a long season.
25. Chicago Cubs (28)
The Cubs move up on the list because their offense has proven itself to be close to average while their pitching is showing itself to be decidedly above average. They’re 19th in offense (94 wRC+), but they are the 11th best staff (5.5 WAR) and have just recently gotten Matt Garza back. They’re likely to trade off their valuable pieces, so I can’t seem them finishing very high in the standings, but they are good enough to challenge the Brewers for 4th place in the Central.
24. New York Mets (20)
The Mets have the 5th worst offense in the game (88 wRC+) and 5th worst defense (-13.1 UZR) in baseball. Their pitching, which I loved entering the season hasn’t done enough (3.7 WAR) to keep me interested in their chances. With Santana hurt and Niese and Gee performing below expectations, Matt Harvey, as great as he is, cannot save them. They’ll get help from Wheeler this summer, but this isn’t a team destined for great things.
23. Kansas City Royals (21)
The Royals improved their pitching staff during the offseason by trading their best position player prospect and it has resulted in the 14th best pitching staff in the league (4.5 WAR) and the 27th best offense (84 wRC+). I was very critical at the time and won’t rehash it for you except to say that even at their best, the Royals are a .500 team. Anyone who expected more was fooling themselves and misunderstanding the quality of their players or what contributes to success in MLB.
22. Chicago White Sox (22)
I admittedly overshot my Sox prediction this year out of fear that they would overperform again. Looks like my caution was unwarranted as the only team producing less on offense is the Marlins (75 wRC+). They get credit for good pitching (8.1 WAR, 4th in MLB), but I’m not convinced that their staff can stay healthy while also getting some recovery from the lineup.
21. Colorado Rockies (25)
I thought the Rockies would be awful, and it looks like they’re just going to be meh. They’ve jumped up the list in both installations, but they were 12-16 in May and look more like that type of team than the one that had the best record in baseball for some of April. Their offense has fallen back to 16th in the league, even if the pitching is still inexplicably hanging in the top 10. Their early season wins will keep them out of the cellar, but they aren’t a great team.
20. Milwaukee Brewers (19)
The Brewers have a solid offense (98 wRC+) that is carried by three standouts, Gomez, Segura, and Braun, but their pitching staff has been really terrible (0.6 WAR). You aren’t winning anything with that kind of pitching, even if you can score a good amount of runs.
19. Los Angeles Dodgers (14)
When I expressed doubts about the Dodgers this preseason, I was doubting their ability to be great in the way that many national writes thought they would be. The $216 million payroll made lots of people think Yankees, but the Dodgers roster was built with players past their prime. So I said they’d be in the Wild Card conversation, not anywhere near the best team in the league. I got half of that right – they aren’t anywhere close to the best team – but I also missed on the Wild Card part so far. I don’t think they’re this bad, but I don’t think they’re good. The offense ranks 17th and the pitching ranks 21st in baseball, and that is with the great Clayton Kershaw. The Dodgers just aren’t very good.
18. Philadelphia Phillies (18)
The Phillies have the 25th ranked offense and 26th ranked pitching so far, which isn’t great at all. However, I think this is their floor and they are still 26-29. They’ll get more from Hamels and Halladay should pitch at the end of the season and Utley will eventually be back. I don’t think they’re good, but they’re doing okay, and I’m not sure they can get worse.
17. Los Angeles Angels (13)
I had the same questions about the Angels that I did about the Dodgers, sort of, entering the year. They have a good offense, but they spent their money on an expensive and bad Josh Hamilton instead of improving their bad pitching staff. It’s cost them. They have the league’s 7th best offense, but 17th best pitching staff and they are already 9.5 games behind the Rangers with another team in between. They’ll play better the rest of the way, but the hole is already too deep.
16. Toronto Blue Jays (12)
Their 99 wRC+ is 13th best in baseball, but their staff ranks 24th with just 2.8 WAR. Partly, this is injuries and partly this is poor performance. Reyes and Johnson will come back. Dickey should get better than this. In general, everything I said could go wrong with Toronto is going wrong at it’s reflected in their 23-32 record. Like the Phillies, there is nowhere to go but up, but that doesn’t mean they’ll get there. Right now, Baseball Prospectus has the Jays playoff odds at less than 2%. I have to agree.
15. Pittsburgh Pirates (17)
The Bucs are going to finally finish over .500. I think. Their offense (93 wRC+) isn’t much to look at, and their pitching (4.2 WAR) is just about average, but they get credit for turning that into a 34-21 record so far. I don’t think they’ll play near this pace the rest of the way, but they only need to play at a 72 win pace the rest of the way to get to 82 wins. It’s going to happen. Probably. Maybe. Man…I don’t know.
14. Cleveland Indians (23)
The Indians are the big movers on the list for a couple reasons. First, they were ranked lower than they should have been in the preseason because the rankings came out just before they got Michael Borun and because I was very cautious above big moves in May because April is often deceiving. But after two months of play, I’m ready to concede the Indians are a good team. They aren’t a playoff team in my book, but they are certainly the second best team in the Central. Right now, they lead the league with a 111 wRC+ and their pitching (3.4 WAR, 22nd in MLB) hasn’t been bad enough to slow them down. Masterson is back to being a good MLB starter and the offense is absolutely for real. They’re a 80-85 win team, but that’s way better than I had them at the start. My bad guys, my bad.
13. Baltimore Orioles (16)
The O’s can hit (111 wRC+), but they aren’t great on the hill (3.3 WAR, 23rd in MLB). They’re certainly a contender, but there are three teams in the AL East I like better this season, but they’re slowly climbing the list as a reward for good performance.
12. Arizona Diamondbacks (15)
I missed a little on the Diamondbacks this preseason because I got distracted by trades I considered to be bad long term moves. But in the short run, they weren’t so bad and the Dbacks do have a very nice team. The offense is 20th in baseball, but the staff is deep (8th in MLB). I love their defense and their young talent and they can absolutely beat the Giants in the West.
11. San Francisco Giants (7)
Speaking of the champs, it’s bizzaro world out at AT&T. They have the 8th best offense in baseball (104 wRC+) and the 27th ranked pitching staff (2.5 WAR). They’re 29-25 despite that and I expect the staff will regress back to the mean, meaning they’ll pitch more like themselves in the second half. That said, I’m not sure I can reasonably consider them a top ten team until I actually see the results.
10. Oakland Athletics (9)
The A’s are right where they belong (11th ranked offense, 10th ranked pitching) and the 32-24 record reflects that. This is a good team built with less than recognizable faces and it’s managed very well. I’m not sure if I’d bet on them to make the playoffs, but they will absolutely be relevant in September.
9. Boston Red Sox (11)
I liked what Boston did this offseason, but I didn’t expect their leading men, Lester, and Buchholz, to also restore themselves in the way that they did. It’s clear at this point that the Sox are legitimate contenders and should be in this until the end.
8. New York Yankees (10)
The Yankees are 31-23 without a single game from Tex, A-Rod, Jeter, or basically Granderson. When the reinforcements come, it should help sustain the performance. I had them down for 86 wins and I think that’s just a little light at the moment considering they’re baseball’s 3rd best staff (8.3 WAR) and are expecting their sluggers back in the next few weeks.
7. Washington Nationals (3)
The Nationals are slowly falling for me. I had them as the best team entering the season and I still believe in their talent, but I do have to adjust my expectations realistically. Gio stumbled a bit and Strasburg has an injury to deal with while Harper has been great, but looks to be hurt as well. They’re just not hitting at all (82 wRC+). I still like them for the playoffs, but they’ve missed 1/3 of the season that they could have been using to set the pace and now getting back on track is the goal rather than setting their October rotation.
6. Tampa Bay Rays (5)
I stuck with the Rays last month after early season stumbles and that looks to have been a sage choice. They are 30-24 are going 18-10 in May and have baseball’s 2nd best offense at the moment (111 wRC+). The pitching is somewhat lower than expected, but David Price wasn’t himself and was hurt, but should be back for the second half. I’m buying the Rays.
5. Cincinnati Reds (6)
The Reds are third in baseball by wins and losses and 11th on offense (102 wRC+) and 9th on the mound (6.0 WAR), which generally makes for a good club. They have Votto and Choo who are raking and a host of other very good complimentary pieces. If only Dusty Baker could figure out that hitting your worst hitter 2nd because he can “handle the bat and bunt” is a terrible thing, they might just run away and hide.
4. Atlanta Braves (1)
The Braves gave themselves a nice April cushion but 15-13 in May is worth pumping the brakes slightly. They can hit (105 wRC+) and haven’t even gotten anything from BJ Upton or Heyward, but the staff is 16th best in baseball and bullpen injuries could pull them back to the pack a bit. They look like a playoff team, but I don’t think they’re the best team.
3. Texas Rangers (4)
You’re sick of hearing it if you’re a regular at the site, but I TOLD YOU THE RANGERS WOULD BE FINE. And they are. The 9th best offense (104 wRC+) and 2nd best staff (10.1 WAR) will do that for you. They don’t miss Hamilton or Napoli a lick and look poised to strut their way to October.
2. St. Louis Cardinals (8)
35-18 is hard to ignore. So is the 5th best staff in the game (7.9 WAR) who has a league best 3.09 team ERA. They’re also reasonable good at the dish (103 wRC+). There isn’t anything not to like, except perhaps the bullpen, and the best record after two months has to count for something.
1. Detroit Tigers (2)
I promise you this isn’t a biased pick. I actually do think the Tigers are the best team and I think this entry will stand up to scrutiny. They’re the fourth best offense in the league (108 wRC+) and far and away the best staff (13.4 WAR). Their starting rotation, as I’ve shown in many posts on this site, is incredible. They have 4 of the best 10 pitchers in the league by WAR this year (and two of the guys above them are a start ahead) and their team FIP and xFIP are both more than a quarter run better than 2nd place. The Tigers can pitch like crazy, but are also a top 5 offense. You know on this site I draw heavily from advanced metrics and if you ranked the teams by position player and pitcher WAR the Tigers are in 1st and it’s not close. The Tigers are 4.3 WAR ahead of 2nd place. They’re something like 5% better than second place by WAR and are only a couple wins off the best record in the AL.
Thoughts on the list? Post a comment.
The Morning Edition (June 1, 2013)
From Last Night:
- Holland and the Rangers pile on the Royals
- Strasburg leaves with an oblique injury, but the Nats manage to win 3-2
- Jacob Turner goes 7 strong to beat the Mets
- Another rough outing for Hamels as the Phils fall to the Crew
- Cueto throws 8 scoreless to beat the Bucs
- Sabathia gets 10 K to beat the Sox
- Another good start by Garza beats the Dbacks
- Bartolo Colon CGSO
- Rays and Indians start late in Cleveland
What I’m Watching Today:
- Cain and Miller try again in St. Louis (1p Eastern)
- Greinke travels to Coors 4p Eastern)
- Bumgarner and Wainwright in game two (7p Eastern)
The Big Question:
- Chris Davis, are you buying or selling?
I’ve remained cautiously skeptical of the Davis breakout, as one should. Entering 2013, he was a career .258/.310/.466 hitter, which is perfectly league average 100 wRC+. Career 6.5 BB%, 31.0 K%. Barely above replacement level. This year, he’s .356/.442/.749, good for 209 wRC+. Everyone wants to believe, but I can’t. He’s never done anything like this and I just don’t think he’s changed his approach enough to sustain star level performance. The power is real, but I don’t buy the average and walk rate. I don’t usually like to be the negative guy, but here we are. Valverde nights will do that to you.
The Morning Edition (May 31, 2013)
From Last Night:
- Freddy Garcia dominates the Nats
- Dillon Gee’s 12 K lead the Mets to a four game sweep of the Yankees
- Kazmir goes 7 strong behind a 7 run inning to beat the Reds
- Felix dominates the Padres as Ryan, Chavez, Franklin, and Morales all homer
- Travis Wood hits a grand slam and gets the win over the White Sox
- Wacha goes 7, gives up 2 hits in his MLB debut and gets a ND
What I’m Watching Today:
- Lester and CC faces off in NY (7p Eastern)
- Moore and Kluber go head to head in Cleveland (7p Eastern)
- Jacob Turner makes his 2013 debut (7p Eastern)
- Strasburg faces the Braves (7p Eastern)
- Cain and Miller in St. Louis (8p Eastern)
- Kershaw at Coors (830p Eastern)
The Big Question:
- Are the Cardinals wizards?
Yesterday, I wrote about teams who do a good job scoring from 2B on a single and today I’m going to look at a nearly opposite concept. Which teams make the most outs on the bases? Specifically, which teams make the most outs at 3B and home on the bases? I isolate those two categories because I think it makes for a good third base coach ranking. Third base coaches signal if a runner should advance to third or home on a play, but runners usually make the choice about second. So here, without much more ado, are the teams that have made the most outs on the bases at 3B and home entering Thursday (listed by raw number, but also shown with percentage of their total outs on the bases):
I haven’t spent enough time with these numbers to really know if it reflects the quality of the team’s third base coach, but I suspect it does. The coach can’t make his runners faster, but he can know which players are capable of taking the extra base and only telling them to advance. They don’t always listen, but a good third base coach should be able to make them. Seattle makes the highest percentage of their baserunning outs at 3B and home, so their coach could probably do more to help. Ideally, you would want to have all zeroes on this board, but the columns showing 3B and home are categories in which the coach plays a role and should therefore be judged. I’ll be thinking about this more and working on a way to further isolate this going forward. If you have suggestions, let me know.
A Changeup in the Tigers Pitching Approach
Fastball velocity catches your attention. Knee-buckling breaking balls demand respect. But the changeup is not usually a pitch that grabs headlines, but here I am, writing about it. I’ve mentioned it briefly in these electronic pages and Rod Allen has touched on it as well: the Tigers are throwing more changeups and it’s working.
Now I’m not sure if this change is coming from Jeff Jones, the Tigers pitching coach, or Jim Leyland. Maybe it’s coming from Alex Avila. Perhaps the starters are doing it themselves and learning from one another. Heck, the front office could be putting useful information about the pitch in front of the players. I don’t know the answer, but I know it’s happening and I know it’s yielding some good results.
First, let’s check out the Tigers starting pitching as a whole over the last five seasons:
The trend is pretty clear, even if we can’t identify the cause. The Tigers are trading fastballs and sliders for curveballs and changeups. Now the slider versus curveball transformation could be many things, but those are both breaking balls and they are moving together. The changeup is a distinct pitch. Let’s look at the same chart but with sliders and curveballs combined:
This allows you to see the trend a little better. Fastballs down, changeups up. Breaking balls mostly constant (splitters, cutters, knucklers all excluded due to very low numbers).
So is this an overall trend that reflects a difference in organizational approach, or is one pitcher getting changeup happy and obscuring the results. (The size of the scale on the vertical axis makes these changes look minor, but we are talking about noticeable changes).
Justin Verlander
Verlander, as you can see below, matches the overall trend perfectly. He’s changed the breaking ball he throws, but he hasn’t really changed the percentage of breaking balls. He has, however, traded fastballs for changeups:
Max Scherzer
The pattern fits Scherzer (joined the Tigers in 2010) a bit less cleanly, as he is using more breaking balls and changeups instead of the fastball. You can see here:
Rick Porcello
I’ve made a ton of Rick Porcello’s breakout campaign this season, and looking at his pitch type, he fits the mold perfectly:
Doug Fister
Fister, too, fits the mold especially if you look at his change from 2011 (when he joined the Tigers):
Anibal Sanchez
Sanchez also fits the mold, especially since joining the Tigers last year, but he is trading breaking balls for changeups more so than fastballs in recent years:
Twelve graphs later, what have we learned? Well we can see that the Tigers starters are collectively and individually moving toward changeups at the expense of the fastball, while also shifting which types of breaking balls they throw. I’m not sure if this change in approach is coming from the pitching coach, the catcher, or the pitchers themselves, but the trend exists and it’s hard to argue with the staff that has 4 of the top 12 pitchers by WAR so far in 2013 and leads the league by more than 3 full wins as an entire pitching staff.
You can see how the results are getting better, even if not all five guys were on the staff each year. Compare this to the top charts. I’m not making the case that the changeups are making the Tigers staff this much better, but rather that the change in pitch type as an organization is a noticeable trend that is tracking with success:
And the last question you should be asking, also has an answer. This is not a league-wide trend:
The Tigers are throwing more changeups. I’m not sure whose idea it was, but it’s working and it isn’t happening in all 30 major league cities. Changeups aren’t usually thought about as a “stuff” pitch, but it might be time to rethink that approach. I know there are some advocates for the pitch, like Dave Cameron at Fangraphs, who like me, thinks great changeups are vastly underappreciated, but on the whole, we overlook the changeup. Maybe we shouldn’t.






















