Was My Favorite Player Any Good?
It’s no secret that younger baseball fans are less discriminating that older fans. You pretty much just pick a player you think is pretty good and that’s it. It’s a very simple and very elegant system. I’m not knocking it, merely pointing out that when we were kids, we didn’t think very deeply about these things.
So today, I thought I’d go back in time and see what the younger version of me was thinking. 16 or 17 years ago, I didn’t know anything about wOBA or FIP. They didn’t even exist. Baseball analysis has come a long way since then. I’m not even sure if my house had an internet connection when I first started watching baseball. I’m pretty sure we didn’t.
The other day I realized that I had never really gone back and evaluated the advanced stats on some of the players I watched growing up. I wouldn’t regret cheering for bad players. In fact, I openly cheer for below average players all the time. That’s not the point. The point is that I wanted to see if my favorite players back in the day when I though AVG, HR, and RBI were the only thing that mattered were any good.
My favorite player as a kid was Tigers OF Bobby Higginson. That’s a blast from the past, right? I modeled by little league number (and every one thereafter) after Higgy’s #4. I went with 44 as an homage. Heck, it’s still in my Twitter handle.
Higginson played from 1995-2005, right in the midst of the steroid era, but still caught on as my favorite player because he was one of very few Tigers who were any good. I remember loving his strong throwing arm from the corner, but he was also a middle of the order bat for my team.
Looking back I am actually a bit shocked to discover that Higginson was a pretty good player! Nice job, young Neil!
Higginson had a career walk rate of 11.5% and K rate of 14.1%, both were better than league average during his era. His approach was good and his career wRC+ was 11% above league average at 111. Bobby Higginson was a solid hitter. His career slash line was .272/.358/.455 and he accumulated more than 17 wins above replacement (WAR) despite a negative defensive rating.
His best season by rate was his 1996 campaign when he posted a 141 wRC+ and he posted his highest WAR in 2000 at 4.3. During his career from 1995-2005 Higginson ranks as the 52nd best outfielder by WAR and 62nd by wRC+. Among Tigers, he was the best position player, leading Damion Easley by more than two wins and had far more games and plate appearances than anyone else in the organization.
So congratulations, young self, you picked a player whom you enjoyed watching and who was a pretty solid player. You didn’t know anything about plate discipline or linear weights, but you still managed to pick a player who was pretty well rated by both measures.
I’m not sure how informative this was, but it’s sometimes nice to look back and just reflect on what it’s like to be a baseball fan. Bobby Higginson was my favorite player growing up and now that I have much better tools to evaluate players, I can now see that he was much more than just a really strong arm. I’d encourage you to go back and check up on the guys you cheered for decades ago, it’s a pretty cool experience. I’ll save Tigers fans some time, though. Al Kaline was awesome, you don’t have to worry.
Dynamic Standings Projection (July 17, 2013)
In case you missed it, in April we launched our Dynamic Standings Projection feature on New English D. A full explanation of the methodology can be found here or by clicking the tab at the top of the page. This project seeks to provide a reasoned and cautious approach to updating our beliefs about the baseball future. You can find a summarization of the original projections here. You’ll notice a column on the far right that indicates the difference in projected wins from the preseason prediction. Positive numbers mean teams are now projected to win more games and negative numbers mean a team is now projected to win fewer games. You’ll notice a series of graphs below the standings section that track how the projections have evolved over the course of the year.
This Dynamic Standings Projection is updated through the All-Star break.
| 17-Jul | W | L | PreDiff | |
| TB | 92 | 70 | 0.568 | 1 |
| BOS | 89 | 73 | 0.549 | 12 |
| NYY | 86 | 76 | 0.531 | 1 |
| BAL | 86 | 76 | 0.531 | 4 |
| TOR | 82 | 80 | 0.506 | -5 |
| W | L | PreDiff | ||
| DET | 91 | 71 | 0.562 | -3 |
| CLE | 80 | 82 | 0.494 | 9 |
| KC | 76 | 86 | 0.469 | 0 |
| CWS | 73 | 89 | 0.451 | -10 |
| MIN | 67 | 95 | 0.414 | 2 |
| W | L | PreDiff | ||
| TEX | 92 | 70 | 0.568 | 1 |
| OAK | 91 | 71 | 0.562 | 7 |
| LAA | 81 | 81 | 0.500 | -7 |
| SEA | 74 | 88 | 0.457 | -1 |
| HOU | 58 | 104 | 0.358 | -2 |
| W | L | PreDiff | ||
| ATL | 91 | 71 | 0.562 | 1 |
| WSH | 87 | 75 | 0.537 | -8 |
| PHI | 82 | 80 | 0.506 | -2 |
| NYM | 75 | 87 | 0.463 | -3 |
| MIA | 62 | 100 | 0.383 | -1 |
| W | L | PreDiff | ||
| STL | 94 | 68 | 0.580 | 6 |
| CIN | 91 | 71 | 0.562 | -1 |
| PIT | 91 | 71 | 0.562 | 9 |
| MIL | 71 | 91 | 0.438 | -8 |
| CHC | 71 | 91 | 0.438 | 3 |
| W | L | PreDiff | ||
| LAD | 84 | 78 | 0.519 | -4 |
| ARZ | 84 | 78 | 0.519 | 2 |
| SF | 81 | 81 | 0.500 | -10 |
| SD | 75 | 87 | 0.463 | -3 |
| COL | 72 | 90 | 0.444 | 9 |
The Morning Edition (July 17, 2013)
From Last Night:
- The AL combines to shut out the NL to earn home field in the WS
- Cabrera scores the go ahead run
- MLB and players tribute Mariano Rivera as he comes in for a perfect 8th inning
What I’m Watching Today:
- Nothing. There is no baseball. This is the worst.
The Big Question:
- Did you like Leyland going to Rivera in the 8th?
Leyland did it to make sure he got in the game, but I liked it for a different reason. This way, Rivera got to walk off the mound to a standing ovation rather than have the team come out onto the field in the 9th. I think it allowed for a better tribute, and the actual inning doesn’t really matter. He’s known for pitching in the 9th, but he should be remembered for being the best reliever, period. The inning doesn’t matter. I enjoyed the game. Let’s get back to baseball.
A Real Fans’ Guide to Watching The All-Star Game
If you’re a real baseball fan, I’m sorry, but the All-Star Game isn’t designed to entertain you. It might entertain you anyway, but the game is for the casual fan. It’s announced by Joe Buck and Tim McCarver. They will interview celebrities. They will talk during the entire game about baseball stories that you are already well versed in. Go ahead and count the number of times they talk about a Yankee who isn’t playing in the game. It will be more than 5, I promised. They’re also going to get a lot of facts wrong about players because they aren’t equipped to handle preparation on 70 players and the season they are having.
“Brett Cecil? Who’s that?! Some guy from Canada, I think. He’s a reliever who doesn’t pitch the 9th inning and he’s in the ASG? What?” is something I would expect to hear Joe Buck say around 9:50pm tonight. You can also expect to hear something about the great seasons Matt Moore and Chris Tillman are having because they are 13-3 and 11-3, respectively. In case you’re wondering, they’re 13th and 22nd in ERA and 16th and 38th in FIP just among qualifying AL starters, but Buck and McCarver don’t know that because they only watch baseball when they are paid to broadcast it.
Basically, if you want to listen to thoughtful baseball analysis that includes accurate commentary on the first half, or simply about the game in front of you, that isn’t an option tonight. Tonight is about Fox pumping up their fall shows and their new 24 hour sports network, Fox Sports 1.
You also won’t see the game’s best players because some didn’t get picked because players and managers don’t look at the right statistics or because some of the game’s elite players didn’t have excellent first halves. The game should either be a showcase of great first halves or of the game’s biggest stars, and whichever side you prefer, tonight will be lacking for you if you actually know stuff about baseball.
So I’m sorry, this is how it is. But you can still have fun because it’s baseball. Here are five key steps:
1. Tune Out The Announcers
This is the simplest and more important of all my tips. Joe Buck and Tim McCarver have nothing important or interesting to say. The only reason to listen to them is if you’re planning to mock them on Twitter or if someone has invaded the press box and no one is live tweeting it. You’ll enjoy the game a lot more if you don’t hear the announcers say stupid things about baseball.
2. Keep MLB At Bat Open
I can’t stress this enough. Fox will not tell you when players are replaced if they’re on defense and they won’t tell you where they are now hitting in the batting order. Last year, there were about 5 changes one inning and they told you about one of them before just giving up and going back to talking about Josh Hamilton’s impending free agency. If you actually want to know who is playing in the game, it is your responsibility to stay on top of it.
3. Use Twitter
Just because Fox doesn’t care about the real fan doesn’t mean baseball writers and fans on Twitter don’t. If you want to see interesting stats or real commentary, jump on Twitter and follow along. It will be much better.
4. Do Your Homework
The key here is to familiarize yourself with pitchers who you haven’t had a chance to see with your own eyes very much. You know who Max Scherzer and Clayton Kershaw are and you’ve seen them throw 100 times because you, the real fan, enjoy beauty. However, you may not have had a chance to watch many Patrick Corbin starts. Head over to Brooks Baseball and pull up each pitcher’s repertoire so that you know if you should be looking for a breaking ball or high heat on the 1-2 pitch you’re about to see.
5. Focus On The Matchups
The All-Star Game can’t really be thought of as a real game, even though “it counts.” Players only play a few innings, starters go one or two innings, and managers make changes based on show. That’s fine, because it’s really an exhibition. But for the die-hard baseball fan who just needs to be watching baseball in order to properly live, it’s not the best offering because it’s not a real game. For you, focus on the matchups. You’re going to get to watch Matt Harvey face Trout, Cano, and Cabrera all in a row. Then it’s going to be Kershaw and against 3 more great hitters. You’re usually scouring MLB.TV to watch Sale versus Harper, but on this night, MLB is bringing every matchup to you. Appreciate the ease with which you’ll be able to watch these pitchers go after the hitters.
So as you sit down to watch tonight, remember that this game isn’t designed for the real baseball fan. This is a game that caters to people who think baseball is boring.
The coverage is going to be bad and the game won’t look anything like a matchup between two real baseball teams, but you’re going to watch because you can’t not watch baseball and you want to cheer for your team’s players and your league. These steps should help, but if they don’t just remember there will be real baseball tomorrow…Thursday…oh man…Friday?! Really? You’re on your own everyone.
The Morning Edition (July 16, 2013)
From Last Night:
- Cespedes defeats Harper in the finals of the HR Derby
What I’m Watching Today:
- Scherzer leads the AL into Citi Field against Matt Harvey (8p Eastern)
The Big Question:
- Can the AL’s power laden lineup return home-field to the Junior Circuit?
It’s good to see Jim Leyland didn’t listen to Cliff Floyd who wanted to put Adam Jones and his low OBP in the leadoff spot and decided to go with Trout. He’ll start the game in the box against Matt Harvey. The future of baseball.
Putting No Hitters Into The Shredder
A couple of weeks ago, Homer Bailey threw a no-hitter and almost everyone celebrated with the usual joy. I was among them. No hitters are fun and I love them for their drama and their rarity. One voice, however, stood out, not in opposition to Bailey, but it opposition to the attention given to no-hitters.
Brian Kenny made the case on Twitter and on MLB Now that no-hitters are not, by definition, the best set of starts even though that’s how most people treat them. Pitchers are trying to prevent runs and to prevent runs you want to limit baserunners. Baserunners reach via hits, walks, and HBPs and we shouldn’t place special focus on one type of way that hitters reach base. A one hit shutout is, according to Kenny (and basic logic) a much better performance than a 6 walk no-hitter.
Kenny is essentially making the other side of the batting average versus OBP argument. Getting on base is what matters for hitters, keeping guys off the bases is what matters for pitchers. He’s right. The quality of the start should be judged by baserunners rather than type of baserunner. I’m on board.
But no-hitters can still be celebrated for their rarity. Kenny makes the point that we shouldn’t celebrate no-hitters as much when the pitcher allows many baserunners because 6 walks is not better than 2 hits and 0 walks. I’m going to take a slightly different path. I’m going to argue we should celebrate no-hitters, but also the other great performances that aren’t no-hitters. We should recalibrate how we treat no-hitters, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t impressive. Five walks are bad, but it’s still really hard to not allow any hits.
Let’s go inside the numbers.
Most No-Hitters Are Great
Since 1916, there have been 204 no-hitters in MLB and all of our data will carry from 1916 through Saturday (7/13/2013) and will focus only on complete games. Let’s start with the number of baserunners allowed in each no hitter in MLB history:
| Baserunners | % of All No Hitters | Count |
| 0 | 10.3 | 21 |
| 1 | 20.6 | 42 |
| 2 | 17.6 | 36 |
| 3 | 14.7 | 30 |
| 4 | 14.2 | 29 |
| 5 | 7.8 | 16 |
| 6 | 5.4 | 11 |
| 7 | 3.9 | 8 |
| 8 | 3.4 | 7 |
| 9 | 0.5 | 1 |
| 10 | 1 | 2 |
| 11 | 0.5 | 1 |
What you can see here is that while some no-hitters aren’t great performances, most no hitters are excellent. 85% of all no-hitters contain 5 or fewer baserunners allowed with the average number of baserunners allowed coming in a 3.03 with a standard deviation of 2.31. What those numbers tell us is that most no-hitters are elite starts and only occasionally worthy of criticism.
But Many Equally Great Starts Aren’t No-Hitters
If you just looked at those numbers, you’d probably feel comfortable celebrating no-hitters because most no-hitters are, in fact, great starts. But there is another side that you don’t see with those numbers. What comes next is what percentage of complete games with a given number of baserunners are no hitters:
| Baserunners | NH/CG % |
| 0 | 100.000 |
| 1 | 30.435 |
| 2 | 7.725 |
| 3 | 2.591 |
| 4 | 1.234 |
| 5 | 0.399 |
| 6 | 0.181 |
| 7 | 0.103 |
| 8 | 0.077 |
| 9 | 0.010 |
| 10 | 0.022 |
| 11 | 0.013 |
This is a more troubling table. We can all agreed that perfect games are great, but aside from that these numbers tell us something else. What you see here is that, for example, 70% of all CG in which a starter allows 1 baserunner aren’t no-hitters. And it gets worse as we move down the list. 92% of all 2 baserunner starts don’t get recognized as no hitters. It’s 97% at 3 baserunners.
If we sit back and agree we should judge pitchers on baserunners allowed, no-hitters are quite deceptive. We’re leaving out a ton of great starts because a pitcher allowed a hit instead of a walk even though they allowed the same number of men to reach base. This is compelling evidence. If we’re looking at the game holistically, no-hitters are interesting because allowing no hits is very rare, but focusing on them is wrong because they make up such a small fraction of each set of complete games.
It’s really rare to see a no-hitter, and it’s rare to see no-hitters that aren’t excellent performances. But there are a ton of starts that are equally as valuable as no-hitters that get far less attention. Let’s put the numbers side by side.
| Baserunners | NH | Non NH CG |
| 0 | 21 | 0 |
| 1 | 42 | 96 |
| 2 | 36 | 430 |
| 3 | 30 | 1128 |
| 4 | 29 | 2321 |
| 5 | 16 | 3999 |
| 6 | 11 | 6079 |
| 7 | 8 | 7734 |
| 8 | 7 | 9121 |
| 9 | 1 | 9620 |
| 10 | 2 | 9070 |
| 11 | 1 | 7924 |
There are 96 1 hitters in MLB history with no other baserunners allowed. Those are better starts than the 29 no hitters with 4 baserunners allowed, but they don’t get the attention they deserve. 430 times a pitcher has allowed 2 baserunners in a start and not gotten credit for a no-hitter while 36 pitchers who had essentially the same outing are credited with no-hitters.
“So, Tell Me What To Think.”
I’m not anti-no-hitter. I love them and they are a lot of fun, but when you take a look at these numbers, you can easily see that we’re celebrating something because it’s rare, not necessarily because it’s the best. Plenty of starts that aren’t no hitters are better than starts that were no hitters, even before we look at strikeouts and great defensive plays.
Kenny is making a very good point when he tells you not to be bound by the statistics of the 1880s. Walks aren’t outs in disguise. They are valuable offensive tools and shouldn’t be brushed aside as meaningless for pitchers. No-hitters are a rare subset of starts, but they are not by definition, the best starts. Plenty of pitchers have thrown 2 hit shutouts who never got to celebrate like Tim Lincecum did when he allowed 5 baserunners. All I’m asking is that you give those guys some credit too.
You don’t have to stop enjoying no-hitters. In fact, you should enjoy them just the same. Baseball is fun and is meant to captivate you. I love no-hitters because they can vanish on every pitch. You can see walks coming when the pitcher allows the 3 ball. They’re super important, but are much less dramatic.
All told, the evidence tells us that no-hitters shouldn’t be revered as great starts, but rather as particularly interesting ones. We should also give more credit to great starts in which pitchers allow hits because those guys are getting short changed. A one hit shutout with 10 strikeouts is an amazing start. A 4 walk no hitters with 4 strikeouts is just very good.
Consider each start in isolation. Allowing no hits is difficult, but if you walk a bunch of batters, you’re not doing your job. What Kenny is really asking you to do is to think for yourself and to analyze the world around you. No-hitters are fun and usually great. But not always. And non no-hitters are sometimes better. You can judge for yourself. The following lines are from Saturday. I know which I’d take if you asked which was better.
Greinke: 9 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 1 BB, 9 K (110 pitches) vs Colorado
Lincecum: 9 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 4 BB, 1 HBP, 13 K (148 pitches) vs SD
The Morning Edition (July 15, 2013)
From Last Night:
- Archer dominates the Astros with a CGSO, 0 BB, 8 K performance
- Iwakuma leads the M’s past the Angels
- Workman flirts with a no-no for the Red Sox but Donaldson walks off for the A’s
- Stop me if you’re heard this, Davis homers, O’s win
- The Phillies beat the White Sox in extras…again
- 3 runs in the 10th get the Nats past the Fish
- The Twins shell Sabathia
What I’m Watching Today:
- HR Derby (8pm Eastern)
The Big Question:
- Will Chris Davis carry his homerun streak into the derby?
I’m not a huge fan of the HR Derby. It’s a fine event, but I think ESPN makes it pretty boring to watch with their interviews with players from the Yankees and Red Sox and commentary about the first half from analysts I don’t really want to listen to. A lot of people have offered ways to freshen the competition, but I think freshening the coverage could be just as good. Instead of Chris Berman screaming “back, back, back…” I’d like to see more coverage focusing on player reactions. We could mic up 15 or 20 players and just bounce around as they talk to each other about the season and the big swings. I think that would be cool. Or we could just get Vin Scully. Either way, I’m pulling for Prince, but will take Davis to win.
How Was The Game? (July 14, 2013)
Very close.
Tigers 5, Rangers 0
Justin Verlander (10-6, 126 IP, 3.50 ERA, 3.23 FIP, 3.1 WAR) almost joined some elite company, coming within just 7 outs of his third career no-hitter on Sunday. The only pitchers to accomplish that feat are Feller, Young, Ryan, and Koufax and Verlander has teased entry into that club on several occasions, including twice now in 2013. He was very solid across 7 innings, giving up 1 H, 3 BB, and 0 R while striking out 3. It was nice to watch a cruise-control Verlander start after a less that Verlander-ish first half. It was a good half by almost anyone’s standards, but Verlander has set a very high bar. The offense also did their job with 3 solo HR from Hunter, Martinez, and Peralta to go with RBI singles by Peralta and Tuiasosopo in the 6th inning. The win gives the Tigers a 52-42 record heading into the break and no worse than a 1.5 game lead in the AL Central on the other side of the break. In case you’re wondering, New English D now endorses scoreboard watching across the final two and a half months. At least six Tigers will hop a plane for Citi Field tonight, but the whole crew will be back in action Friday behind Anibal Sanchez (7-6, 92 IP, 2.93 ERA, 2.30 FIP, 3.3 WAR).
The Moment: Verlander makes a run at his 3rd no-hitter.
SOEFA Sunday: Reliever Rankings Update (July 14, 2013)
You’ll recall earlier this year we introduced our very own reliever rankings called SOEFA, which you can read about in detail here. For a brief refresher, it combines strand rate, expected OBP against, ERA-, and FIP- into a deviation from league average. Zero is average, and will generally range between -2.5 to 2.5. This includes all pitchers who have thrown at least 20 IP in relief. Should you wish to know the SOEFA for any other reliever, or on a day that isn’t Sunday, hit us on Twitter or in the comments section.
| Rank | Player | Team | SOEFA |
| 1 | Alex Torres | Rays | 1.05 |
| 2 | Joaquin Benoit | Tigers | 0.99 |
| 3 | Neal Cotts | Rangers | 0.97 |
| 4 | Drew Smyly | Tigers | 0.94 |
| 5 | Mark Melancon | Pirates | 0.88 |
| 6 | Greg Holland | Royals | 0.87 |
| 7 | Sergio Romo | Giants | 0.87 |
| 8 | Will Harris | Diamondbacks | 0.84 |
| 9 | Jason Grilli | Pirates | 0.81 |
| 10 | Jordan Walden | Braves | 0.79 |
| 11 | Oliver Perez | Mariners | 0.78 |
| 12 | Javier Lopez | Giants | 0.78 |
| 13 | Jesse Crain | White Sox | 0.77 |
| 14 | Sam LeCure | Reds | 0.76 |
| 15 | Glen Perkins | Twins | 0.75 |
| 16 | Kenley Jansen | Dodgers | 0.74 |
| 17 | Trevor Rosenthal | Cardinals | 0.74 |
| 18 | Edward Mujica | Cardinals | 0.71 |
| 19 | Casey Fien | Twins | 0.71 |
| 20 | Shawn Kelley | Yankees | 0.69 |
| 21 | Joe Thatcher | Padres | 0.69 |
| 22 | Craig Kimbrel | Braves | 0.65 |
| 23 | Koji Uehara | Red Sox | 0.64 |
| 24 | Brett Cecil | Blue Jays | 0.63 |
| 25 | Preston Claiborne | Yankees | 0.62 |
| 26 | Casey Janssen | Blue Jays | 0.62 |
| 27 | Kevin Gregg | Cubs | 0.61 |
| 28 | David Robertson | Yankees | 0.59 |
| 29 | Sean Doolittle | Athletics | 0.57 |
| 30 | Tommy Hunter | Orioles | 0.57 |
| 31 | Junichi Tazawa | Red Sox | 0.56 |
| 32 | Boone Logan | Yankees | 0.55 |
| 33 | Dale Thayer | Padres | 0.53 |
| 34 | Andrew Bailey | Red Sox | 0.52 |
| 35 | Francisco Rodriguez | Brewers | 0.52 |
| 36 | Edgmer Escalona | Rockies | 0.5 |
| 37 | Joel Peralta | Rays | 0.49 |
| 38 | Brian Matusz | Orioles | 0.49 |
| 39 | Manny Parra | Reds | 0.48 |
| 40 | Robbie Ross | Rangers | 0.48 |
| 41 | Sandy Rosario | Giants | 0.48 |
| 42 | Andrew Miller | Red Sox | 0.47 |
| 43 | Seth Maness | Cardinals | 0.47 |
| 44 | Ernesto Frieri | Angels | 0.47 |
| 45 | Paco Rodriguez | Dodgers | 0.46 |
| 46 | Bobby Parnell | Mets | 0.46 |
| 47 | Brandon Kintzler | Brewers | 0.45 |
| 48 | Matt Belisle | Rockies | 0.44 |
| 49 | Josh Collmenter | Diamondbacks | 0.44 |
| 50 | David Carpenter | Braves | 0.43 |
| 51 | Jason Frasor | Rangers | 0.43 |
| 52 | Aroldis Chapman | Reds | 0.42 |
| 53 | Matt Reynolds | Diamondbacks | 0.42 |
| 54 | Luis Avilan | Braves | 0.42 |
| 55 | Chad Gaudin | Giants | 0.41 |
| 56 | Steve Cishek | Marlins | 0.41 |
| 57 | Vin Mazzaro | Pirates | 0.41 |
| 58 | Grant Balfour | Athletics | 0.4 |
| 59 | Jonathan Papelbon | Phillies | 0.4 |
| 60 | Luke Hochevar | Royals | 0.4 |
| 61 | Scott Downs | Angels | 0.4 |
| 62 | Darren O’Day | Orioles | 0.39 |
| 63 | J.P. Howell | Dodgers | 0.38 |
| 64 | Chad Qualls | Marlins | 0.37 |
| 65 | Steve Delabar | Blue Jays | 0.37 |
| 66 | Luke Gregerson | Padres | 0.37 |
| 67 | Randy Choate | Cardinals | 0.36 |
| 68 | Ryan Cook | Athletics | 0.36 |
| 69 | Tanner Scheppers | Rangers | 0.35 |
| 70 | Tom Gorzelanny | Brewers | 0.35 |
| 71 | Rafael Soriano | Nationals | 0.34 |
| 72 | Brad Ziegler | Diamondbacks | 0.34 |
| 73 | Justin Wilson | Pirates | 0.34 |
| 74 | James Russell | Cubs | 0.33 |
| 75 | Addison Reed | White Sox | 0.32 |
| 76 | Antonio Bastardo | Phillies | 0.32 |
| 77 | Cody Allen | Indians | 0.31 |
| 78 | Alfredo Simon | Reds | 0.31 |
| 79 | Jim Henderson | Brewers | 0.29 |
| 80 | Tyler Clippard | Nationals | 0.28 |
| 81 | Tony Watson | Pirates | 0.26 |
| 82 | Craig Breslow | Red Sox | 0.26 |
| 83 | Jerome Williams | Angels | 0.26 |
| 84 | Fernando Rodney | Rays | 0.25 |
| 85 | Jean Machi | Giants | 0.25 |
| 86 | Rafael Betancourt | Rockies | 0.25 |
| 87 | Rex Brothers | Rockies | 0.24 |
| 88 | Caleb Thielbar | Twins | 0.23 |
| 89 | Jamey Wright | Rays | 0.22 |
| 90 | Michael Kohn | Angels | 0.22 |
| 91 | Anthony Varvaro | Braves | 0.21 |
| 92 | Jose Mijares | Giants | 0.2 |
| 93 | Josh Outman | Rockies | 0.2 |
| 94 | Yoervis Medina | Mariners | 0.2 |
| 95 | Pat Neshek | Athletics | 0.19 |
| 96 | Jose Veras | Astros | 0.19 |
| 97 | Jesse Chavez | Athletics | 0.17 |
| 98 | Nate Jones | White Sox | 0.17 |
| 99 | Greg Burke | Mets | 0.15 |
| 100 | Charlie Furbush | Mariners | 0.15 |
| 101 | Joe Nathan | Rangers | 0.15 |
| 102 | Matt Lindstrom | White Sox | 0.13 |
| 103 | Alfredo Figaro | Brewers | 0.13 |
| 104 | Aaron Loup | Blue Jays | 0.13 |
| 105 | Tim Collins | Royals | 0.12 |
| 106 | Jim Johnson | Orioles | 0.12 |
| 107 | Dane de la Rosa | Angels | 0.11 |
| 108 | Anthony Swarzak | Twins | 0.11 |
| 109 | Bryan Morris | Pirates | 0.11 |
| 110 | Matt Thornton | White Sox | 0.09 |
| 111 | Mariano Rivera | Yankees | 0.09 |
| 112 | Joe Ortiz | Rangers | 0.08 |
| 113 | Joe Smith | Indians | 0.07 |
| 114 | Tyson Ross | Padres | 0.07 |
| 115 | Ross Wolf | Rangers | 0.06 |
| 116 | Cesar Ramos | Rays | 0.06 |
| 117 | Darren Oliver | Blue Jays | 0.06 |
| 118 | Joe Kelly | Cardinals | 0.06 |
| 119 | Adam Ottavino | Rockies | 0.05 |
| 120 | John Axford | Brewers | 0.04 |
| 121 | LaTroy Hawkins | Mets | 0.04 |
| 122 | Aaron Crow | Royals | 0.03 |
| 123 | Carter Capps | Mariners | 0.02 |
| 124 | Josh Edgin | Mets | 0.02 |
| 125 | Kevin Jepsen | Angels | 0.02 |
| 126 | Jared Burton | Twins | 0 |
| 127 | Ryan Pressly | Twins | 0 |
| 128 | Danny Farquhar | Mariners | -0.01 |
| 129 | Tony Sipp | Diamondbacks | -0.01 |
| 130 | J.J. Hoover | Reds | -0.01 |
| 131 | Troy Patton | Orioles | -0.02 |
| 132 | A.J. Ramos | Marlins | -0.03 |
| 133 | Drew Storen | Nationals | -0.03 |
| 134 | Jake McGee | Rays | -0.03 |
| 135 | Tom Wilhelmsen | Mariners | -0.03 |
| 136 | Wilton Lopez | Rockies | -0.04 |
| 137 | Bryan Shaw | Indians | -0.04 |
| 138 | Luke Putkonen | Tigers | -0.04 |
| 139 | Burke Badenhop | Brewers | -0.05 |
| 140 | Mike Dunn | Marlins | -0.05 |
| 141 | Brad Brach | Padres | -0.07 |
| 142 | Ryan Webb | Marlins | -0.1 |
| 143 | Matt Guerrier | – – – | -0.1 |
| 144 | Heath Bell | Diamondbacks | -0.1 |
| 145 | Darin Downs | Tigers | -0.1 |
| 146 | David Hernandez | Diamondbacks | -0.1 |
| 147 | Logan Ondrusek | Reds | -0.12 |
| 148 | Chris Perez | Indians | -0.13 |
| 149 | Jose Cisnero | Astros | -0.13 |
| 150 | Craig Stammen | Nationals | -0.14 |
| 151 | Paul Clemens | Astros | -0.14 |
| 152 | Brad Lincoln | Blue Jays | -0.15 |
| 153 | Tim Stauffer | Padres | -0.15 |
| 154 | Joba Chamberlain | Yankees | -0.17 |
| 155 | Jerry Blevins | Athletics | -0.17 |
| 156 | Brian Duensing | Twins | -0.18 |
| 157 | Cory Gearrin | Braves | -0.19 |
| 158 | Michael Gonzalez | Brewers | -0.19 |
| 159 | Nick Hagadone | Indians | -0.2 |
| 160 | George Kontos | Giants | -0.2 |
| 161 | Scott Rice | Mets | -0.2 |
| 162 | Blake Beavan | Mariners | -0.21 |
| 163 | Wesley Wright | Astros | -0.23 |
| 164 | Rich Hill | Indians | -0.23 |
| 165 | Jonathan Broxton | Reds | -0.26 |
| 166 | Kyle Farnsworth | Rays | -0.27 |
| 167 | Garrett Richards | Angels | -0.27 |
| 168 | Vinnie Pestano | Indians | -0.3 |
| 169 | Josh Roenicke | Twins | -0.31 |
| 170 | Phil Coke | Tigers | -0.31 |
| 171 | Ronald Belisario | Dodgers | -0.31 |
| 172 | Travis Blackley | Astros | -0.32 |
| 173 | T.J. McFarland | Orioles | -0.36 |
| 174 | Hector Ambriz | Astros | -0.36 |
| 175 | Clayton Mortensen | Red Sox | -0.4 |
| 176 | Mike Adams | Phillies | -0.4 |
| 177 | Alex Wilson | Red Sox | -0.43 |
| 178 | Matt Albers | Indians | -0.45 |
| 179 | Brandon Lyon | Mets | -0.49 |
| 180 | Esmil Rogers | Blue Jays | -0.49 |
| 181 | Huston Street | Padres | -0.5 |
| 182 | Bruce Chen | Royals | -0.53 |
| 183 | Adam Warren | Yankees | -0.56 |
| 184 | Al Alburquerque | Tigers | -0.57 |
| 185 | Jeremy Horst | Phillies | -0.59 |
| 186 | Pedro Strop | – – – | -0.61 |
| 187 | Kelvin Herrera | Royals | -0.67 |
| 188 | Henry Rodriguez | – – – | -0.7 |
| 189 | Michael Kirkman | Rangers | -0.71 |
| 190 | Carlos Marmol | Cubs | -0.72 |
| 191 | Jeremy Affeldt | Giants | -0.79 |
| 192 | Anthony Bass | Padres | -0.88 |
| 193 | Shawn Camp | Cubs | -1.02 |
| 194 | Hector Rondon | Cubs | -1.05 |
| 195 | Brandon League | Dodgers | -1.65 |
The Morning Edition (July 14, 2013)
From Last Night:
- Greinke twirls a CGSO to beat the Rockies despite Chatwood’s CG, 1 ER gem.
- Davis homers again, but Orioles fall to the Jays
- Lincecum no hits the Padres, featuring 13 Ks. (Late out west, hence the lack of intense attention)
- The White Sox tops the Phillies with 2 in the 11th
- Hughes K’s 10, but gives up 4 as the Yanks fall to the Twins
- Haren and Fernandez pitch well, Marlins win in 10
What I’m Watching Today:
- Shields takes on the Indians (1p Eastern)
- Hamels tries to stay on a role (1p Eastern)
- Wainwright and Wood take the final stage before the break (8p Eastern)
The Big Question:
- Who will replace the Sunday starters and injured players on the All-Star rosters?
Enjoy the last day before the break. It’s going to be a slow few days!
New English D 