Should We Worry About Jackson?
In an all-around sense, Austin Jackson is an excellent baseball player. He’s well above average in the field no matter what statistic you look at or if you’re just a person with eyes and he’s also very good on the bases. His offense will be the difference between solid-starter and perennial all-star, so it will be the subject of this post.
The origin of the analysis comes from a Tweet sent out challenging the author:
While Cam and I are friends and he’s an occasional guest on New English D Audio, he’s hit on my role in the Tigers blogging community. Apparently, I’m the guy who finds out what’s wrong with players and tells you if you should worry or not. That’s fine, I’m on board. So first, is anything wrong with Jackson?
He’s on pace for something like a 3.5 WAR (what’s WAR?) season, which is very good, but it’s not quite like the 5.2 mark he posted a year ago. As I said before, the defense and baserunning are in line with his normal production, so it’s all about the bat (once we’ve corrected for his DL time).
Let’s start with some simple season by season comparisons of his AVG, OBP, and SLG and then we’ll use wRC+ (what’s wRC+?) to compare him to league average. Remember 100 is average and every point above or below is that percent better or worse than average.
So the basic story is pretty clear. In the context of 2012, this year looks bad. In the context of the rest of his career it looks fine. Is he around average or is he a star? That’s our basic question. He’s been a very high BABIP guy (what’s BABIP?) in his entire career and these overall numbers trend along with BABIP.
So the issue with Jackson is that he’s hitting below his established BABIP. Now BABIP is a pretty fluky stat in small samples, but line drive hitters are usually above average in this department and he has always been a guy who maintains a big number. He’s closer to average (about .300) this year than ever before. Is that to blame and is that his fault?
Let’s consider this season in particular because I think it’s interesting. I don’t think it’s been all bad, I think we’re looking at a slump of some kind. Let’s check out his monthly splits. Remember he has fewer May and June PAs because of the injury:
He hit well in April, struggled a little in May before the DL stint, played well at the end of June and hasn’t been great at all in July and August. Since July 1st, he’s hitting .215/.257/.356 (.280 BABIP). That’s not very good. Before July 1, he was .290/.374/.401 (.348 BABIP), which is very good for a CF, especially one who plays the rest of the game so well.
So the question is this. Is the first half Jackson the real one or is the second half Jackson the real one? Or is it the combination of the two?
My take is this. Jackson is a high BABIP guy who gets a lot of his value from getting more hits on balls in play than most, so he is susceptible to slumps based on luck. And sometimes those things snowball. I think he’s a good hitter, who will occasionally have these struggles. Let’s take a look at the batted ball data:
So keep in mind the varying sample sizes. Look at April and July most carefully. He’s hitting the ball in the air instead of hitting in on the ground and on a line. Remember what I said about BABIP and line drive hitters. Jackson will be more successful when he hits line drives and ground balls, so this correlates perfectly with the results. Jackson is performing worse because his BABIP is lower which is lower because he’s hitting the ball in the air more often. This is pretty straightforward, so now the question is if this is something Jackson is doing differently or if it’s just random noise that will correct itself.
I will point out that some of this is strikeouts, but not all of it. He was a 17.8% K guy in April-June and has been a 27.4% K guy since. But BABIP is only about balls in play. I’ve looked at the swing charts between the two periods and I don’t see a huge difference. If you look a spray charts, you see something of a difference:
He’s hitting fewer balls to the middle of the field and is using left and right more often since July 1. Remember the sample size is different, but the void up the middle is clear. Jackson is striking out more, but he was well below his career average entering July so you had so expect some change. As for the balls in play, it looks like he’s hitting the ball in the air too much and not back up the middle as much. To me, this is just an approach thing that needs a little work.
Jackson has the contact and pitch recognition skills to square up a ball, he’s just not doing it right now. With a little work with the hitting coaches, he should be able to get himself back on track. His swing can get long at times, and I think that’s all this is. Baseball players will go in and out of this kind of thing.
To me, it doesn’t look like this is basic random variation. I think there is something a little off with his approach, but it doesn’t look like something he can’t fix. We’ve seen him come out of stretches like this without a problem. Despite the streak, he’s still a league average hitter and an above average everything else.
Jackson is slumping a little, but nothing that can’t be fixed.
Dynamic Standings Projection (August 7, 2013)
In case you missed it, in April we launched our Dynamic Standings Projection feature on New English D. A full explanation of the methodology can be found here or by clicking the tab at the top of the page. This project seeks to provide a reasoned and cautious approach to updating our beliefs about the baseball future. You can find a summarization of the original projections here. You’ll notice a column on the far right that indicates the difference in projected wins from the preseason prediction. Positive numbers mean teams are now projected to win more games and negative numbers mean a team is now projected to win fewer games. You’ll notice a series of graphs below the standings section that track how the projections have evolved over the course of the year.
This Dynamic Standings Projection is updated through the August 6 games.
| 7-Aug | W | L | PreDiff | |
| TB | 94 | 68 | 0.580 | 3 |
| BOS | 91 | 71 | 0.562 | 14 |
| BAL | 87 | 75 | 0.537 | 5 |
| NYY | 83 | 79 | 0.512 | -2 |
| TOR | 79 | 83 | 0.488 | -8 |
| W | L | PreDiff | ||
| DET | 96 | 66 | 0.593 | 2 |
| CLE | 83 | 79 | 0.512 | 12 |
| KC | 81 | 81 | 0.500 | 5 |
| MIN | 70 | 92 | 0.432 | 5 |
| CWS | 68 | 94 | 0.420 | -15 |
| W | L | PreDiff | ||
| TEX | 91 | 71 | 0.562 | 0 |
| OAK | 90 | 72 | 0.556 | 6 |
| LAA | 78 | 84 | 0.481 | -10 |
| SEA | 75 | 87 | 0.463 | 0 |
| HOU | 56 | 106 | 0.346 | -4 |
| W | L | PreDiff | ||
| ATL | 96 | 66 | 0.593 | 6 |
| WSH | 83 | 79 | 0.512 | -12 |
| PHI | 77 | 85 | 0.475 | -7 |
| NYM | 75 | 87 | 0.463 | -3 |
| MIA | 63 | 99 | 0.389 | 0 |
| W | L | PreDiff | ||
| STL | 93 | 69 | 0.574 | 5 |
| PIT | 93 | 69 | 0.574 | 11 |
| CIN | 90 | 72 | 0.556 | -2 |
| MIL | 72 | 90 | 0.444 | -7 |
| CHC | 70 | 92 | 0.432 | 2 |
| W | L | PreDiff | ||
| LAD | 89 | 73 | 0.549 | 1 |
| ARZ | 82 | 80 | 0.506 | 0 |
| SF | 78 | 84 | 0.481 | -13 |
| SD | 76 | 86 | 0.469 | -2 |
| COL | 71 | 91 | 0.438 | 8 |
The Morning Edition (August 7, 2013)
From Last Night:
- Harper homers off Teheran and gets a fastball in his leg the next time out, Nats lose
- The Twins rock Shields, Albers nearly goes the distance in his debut
- Latos superb as Reds top the A’s
- Josh Harrison walks off against the Marlins
What I’m Watching Today:
- Colon and Bailey face off at GABP (1230p Eastern)
- Medlen takes on Zimmermann (7p Eastern)
- Matt Harvey Day! (7p Eastern)
- Shelby Miller faces the Dodgers (8p Eastern)
The Big Question:
- Thoughts on the Harper/Teheran dustup?
You know I’m always coming down against the guy throwing the ball at the batter, but a couple of points should be made. If Teheran hit him on purpose, at least he kept it down in an area that wasn’t dangerous. So good on him for not being Weaver. Second, it’s childish to throw at a guy for homering off you, even if he did watch it a little too long. This isn’t the middle ages, you don’t duel someone over your honor. Shake it off. You threw the meatball, you have to watch him strut. I don’t like when players hot dog it around the bases but you shouldn’t throw at them for it and Harper just admired it and then got moving. It might not have been intentional, but if it was, that’s my take.
A Quick Verlander Release Point Recap
About two weeks ago I wrote a piece explaining how Verlander’s troubles this season can be chalked up to his inconsistent release point. You can read the entire thing here, in which I lay out the problem in the results, the causes of those problems, and the root cause – release point – that is behind the whole thing. I’ll trust that you’ll believe me or go back and read that piece so I don’t have to repeat myself here.
It’s August 6th and Verlander just twirled 8 excellent innings against the Indians and the initial thing that will catch your eye is his increased fastball velocity (average 96.9, top 100.8). But as you know, I’m not interested in the velocity issue, I’m interested in his release point. So how’d it look?
First, let me show you full season graphs from 2012 and 2013 to get you up to speed on what we’re looking for (from catcher’s perspective):
The difference is obvious. In the initial post I isolated it by pitch type, but let’s just keep it going. You’ll notice our goal is to keep everything to the left of the imaginary -1.5 line. You want the data points between -2.5 and -1.5. That’s the sweet spot. Also between 6 and 7 feet vertically, but that hasn’t been an issue this year.
How’d he do tonight?
First allow me to apologize for using a different plotting source. The graphs above are from FanGraphs, which won’t update until tomorrow. Below is from Brooks Baseball. I’ll make two notes. One, I’ve looked at the actual numbers from the source and they confirm the graphic. Two, I’ve drawn in the lines of interest because I’m a super helpful guy.
The danger zone is empty. If you look at the source data, there are a couple points that are technically less than an inch over the -1.5 line, but the first two graphs aren’t super precise, so that’s not an issue. I would also like to point out, that thanks to reader suggestion, I checked to see if the Cleveland Pitch F/X setup could be influencing these results. Comparing Sanchez’s start on Monday compared to his last start at Comerica Park showed no systemic bias. In fact, if anything, my exploration of other Sanchez starts indicates that the Cleveland setup might actually be working against Verlander in the example I’m about to show you. I’m not going to wager my life savings on this, but JV’s improvement seems to be showing up despite any sort of technical issues.
If you take a look at the movement charts, there is still room left to improve. The curveball had nice depth, but it needs more horizontal tilt. That said, the velocity is up and the release point looks great. I’m encouraged. The process was good and the results were there against a very good offense. Want more evidence? Below I’ve done the plotting myself for consistency. The first is a terrible start against the worst offense in the AL, the second is tonight against the very good Indians:
Need I say more?
Guys, I think he’s back. The American League is on notice. (Editor’s note: The velocity and release point gains carried into his next start. Details here)
How Was The Game? (August 6, 2013)
Filled with everything you could ever want.
Tigers 5, Indians 1
So let’s recap what happened tonight. Justin Verlander (24 GS, 151.2 IP, 3.74 ERA, 3.32 FIP, 3.5 WAR) had one of his best starts since April with excellent velocity (96.9 MPH average FB, up to 100.8 MPH), terrific command, and a full helping of breaking pitches that allowed him to spin 8 innings of 4 hit, 1 run, 0 walk, 1 HBP, and 7 strikeout ball. Also, the Tigers extended their winning streak to 10 games and pushed their lead in the Central to 5 games. There was also the matter of Don Kelly being amazing with a 3-4 night that included the stomach punch homerun against Masterson. At the risk of being called for using a double negative, there simply wasn’t anything not to like. Verlander was great, Don Kelly led the way, and the Tigers won. That’s the whole story and it’s all you need. The Tigers will call upon Doug Fister (22 GS, 143 IP, 3.52 ERA, 3.26 FIP, 3.1 WAR) to clinch a series victory on Wednesday.
The Moment: Don Kelly turns on one in the 5th, sending it into the seats.
New English D Audio (Episode 4)
On this edition of New English D Audio I talk with Cameron Bonk of The Farm Club and The Guy Show about Peralta, PEDs in general, the Tigers hot streak, postseason prospects, and terrible announcers in sports. Return listeners of the program will notice the audio quality is improved and the two participants speak with equal volume! Should you have questions about our Detroit Tigers podcast or related questions, comments, or suggestions direct them to me on Twitter @NeilWeinberg44 or to NewEnglishD@gmail.com. The following link will direct you to another page that will allow you to download the podcast with one additional click.
Download (Approx 44 mins)
The Anatomy Of A Winning Streak
With a thrilling victory on Monday night, the Tigers pushed their season long winning streak to 9 games as they recorded their 13th win in their last 14 games. Based on a quick Baseball-Reference search, it looks like this is the 52nd 9 game winning streak in Tigers history. Now this includes the first 9 games of a 10 games streak and games 2-10 of that same streak, but a nine game streak is a nine game streak. By the same method, there are 24 10-game streaks. 12 11-game streaks. 7 12-game streaks. 4 13-game streaks and just 2 14-game streaks, which stand as the team record.
The 1909 and 1934 Tigers won 14 games in a row. The current Tigers are at 9. That’s five games, which is an eternity in winning streak years. It’s unlikely the Tigers will get there, but for now let’s just appreciate the ride on which we find ourselves.
They’ve scored 52 runs and allowed just 12, good for 5.8 runs per game and 1.3 runs per game allowed. The streak includes a three game sweep of the Phillies, a two game sweep of the Nationals, a three game sweep of the White Sox, and a win in Cleveland.
The first 8 games were at home and they sold out each one. They’ve gained just one game in the standings because the Indians have played well, but they started this streak with the a .554 winning percentage (89 win pace) and are currently sitting at .591 (95 win pace). The Tigers have won 95 games twice in the last 8 years, but haven’t won more since 1987.
When the streak began the Tigers had outscored their opponents by 99 runs, which was second best in baseball. They’re still second to the Cardinals, but now they’ve added 40 runs to that total.
First it was a pitcher’s duel. Then a blowout. Then another. Then they faced Strasburg and it looked close until Avila sent a grand slam deep into the night. The Tigers rocked Gio Gonzalez, snuck past Hector Santiago, Scherzer pitched a gem, and then the Tigers rallied back to win in extras after nearly giving it away. And then came the 9th inning comeback capped by an Avila long ball in Cleveland. (Sensing a theme?)
During the streak, the starting pitching has been great. But not just collectively, individually:
- Fister: 16 IP, 0.56 ERA, 2.23 FIP
- Scherzer: 13.2 IP, 0.00 ERA, 1.80 FIP
- Porcello: 13.2 IP, 2.63 ERA, 3.63 FIP
- Sanchez: 14.2 IP, 1.84 ERA, 3.11 FIP
- Verlander: 6 IP, 1.50 ERA, 3.54 FIP
And let’s recall that Miguel Cabrera hasn’t played much of a role in this whole affair. He’s had just 15 PA in the last 9 games. Sure he’s hit .385/.467/.615, but that’s no better than his season pace. Beyond that, Price Fielder’s 39 PA have turned in a .176/.282/.235 line. And Austin Jackson is hitting .179/.238/.308. The guys who should be the Tigers’ 3 best offensive players haven’t done anything during this streak either with poor performance or not being on the field.
It helps that Alex Avila has 32 PA in that span and is hitting .300/.344/.700. The erstwhile shortstop, Jhonny Peralta, hit .345/.406/.621 in 32 PA. Andy Dirks has posted 21 PA of .294/.429/.353. Torii Hunter has 29 PA with a .429/.414/.750 line (notice how his OBP is lower than his BA, fun!). And Victor Martinez is par for the course with 38 trips to the plate of .382/.447/.441.
The Tigers have won on the backs of great starting pitching and the bottom of the order. Tuiasosopo isn’t getting hits, but he’s got a .350 OBP in that span. Ramon Santiago’s fill in time has offered him 31 PA and he’s rewarded the Tigers with .400/.467/.480. Pena only has 7 PA, but he has a 1.429 OPS in that span.
Think about it, the Tigers have won 9 straight games with only 15 PA from Cabrera and no production from Fielder or Jackson. You can’t win more than 9 of 9 but the Tigers could be performing even better. The top of their order hasn’t been itself and they’re still running over the competition.
The strength of this team is its starting pitching, but the offense is also baseball’s best. The bullpen has pitched 20 innings and has allowed just 2 earned runs (0.90 ERA). They’ll never be a premium defensive team, but they’ve made some very nice plays and have committed just 2 errors during the streak.
What you’re watching is the peak of the 2013 Tigers. They have the best offense and best staff in baseball, good for the highest number of wins above replacement (what’s WAR?) of any club in the sport. As it stands, only the Pirates have fewer losses than the Tigers and only 4 clubs have higher winning percentages carried by playing more games so far.
The Tigers came into the season with big expectations and a bad taste in their mouths. They’ve played well the whole way, but you’re finally watching the correction between the underlying performance and the won loss record. Baseball Prospectus calculates something called 3rd Order Wins, which projects how many games you should win based on their underlying numbers and no one is better than the Tigers in that department. The real wins are catching up. The streak helps, but the overall stretch helping.
It’s not just 9 of 9. It’s 13 of 14. It’s 22 of 29. The Tigers have been on a role for a month. In the early Jim Leyland years, the Tigers were notorious for second half collapses, but in the last 3 seasons they’ve turned it on. In 2011 they won 12 straight to put the division away. Some called that the anti-collapse. Last year they finished strong. They’re doing it again.
The came 4 wins short of a title in 2012. 2013 looks like a team built to do it again and maybe even go a little further.
The Morning Edition (August 6, 2013)
From Last Night:
- MLB hands down BioGenesis suspensions, no new names are big, and A-Rod is the only one to appeal
- Greinke and the Dodgers edge Wainwright and the Cards in a potential playoff preview
- Atlanta beats the Nats despite a strong start for Strasburg, seemingly buries Nats
- A player returns to the field and the media pays attention in Chicago
What I’m Watching Today:
- Fully exonerated Gio Gonzalez goes against Teheran in DC (7p Eastern)
- Battle of the Justin’s in Cleveland, Masterson and Verlander (7p Eastern)
- Kuroda goes against Sale (8p Eastern)
- Kershaw faces the Cardinals (8p Eastern)
- Darvish takes on the Angels (10p Eastern)
- Felix welcomes the Jays (10p Eastern)
The Big Question:
- Can we finally stop talking about Biogenisis?
Apparently, the media says no because A-Rod is appealing so we have to hear about it for weeks. Come on guys, let’s talk about baseball! For every word someone writes about A-Rod, it should be required that they also write one about the Pirates. I’ll start, the Pirates are the only team (entering Monday) who had four qualifying players to be above average on offense, defense, and on the bases using wRC+, UZR, and BsR. Fun!
How Was The Game? (August 5, 2013)
A sign that all good things don’t have to come to an end.
Tigers 4, Indians 2
You can’t win them all, but the Tigers just might. They got an excellent outing from Anibal Sanchez (19 GS, 118.2 IP, 2.58 ERA, 2.36 FIP , 4.1 WAR) who went 7.2 innings, allowing 4 hits, 2 runs, 2 walks, and 11 strikeouts. The bats weren’t able to back Sanchez’s gem and two key baserunning mistakes, one by Hunter in the first and one by Jackson in the eighth, kept the Tigers from cashing in on their opportunities until they unloaded in the 9th. Fielder doubled, Martinez singled, Dirks walked, and then Alex Avila stepped in and sent Chris Perez to the showers with a homerun to eruption from the Tigers bench and faithful in Cleveland. This win probability graph from FanGraphs tells the entire story:
The win is the Tigers’ 9th in a row, 13th in their last 14, and pushes them to 20 games over .500 and 4 up on the Indians in the Central. They’ll celebrate this one and get ready for Tuesday’s game that features Justin Verlander (23 GS, 143.2 IP, 3.88 ERA, 3.41 FIP, 3.1 WAR) facing the Indian’s Justin, this one called Masterson.
The Moment: Avila puts the Tigers ahead in the 9th with a 3 run HR.
MLB Suspends Jhonny Peralta
On Monday, MLB finally let the other shoe drop and suspended more than a dozen players for their connection to Tony Bosch’s BioGenensis clinic. I won’t rehash the story, you know the deal. We learned today that Peralta was suspended and accepted a 50 game ban for his connection to the PED distributor Bosch. Barring rainouts, he will be eligible to return to the field on September 27th in Miami, ironically, for the final 3 games of the season. At this point, we have no specific information about what evidence MLB found regarding Peralta but he issued this statement:
“In spring of 2012, I made a terrible mistake that I deeply regret. I apologize to everyone that I have hurt as a result of my mistake, including my teammates, the Tigers’ organization, the great fans in Detroit, Major League Baseball, and my family. I take full responsibility for my actions, have no excuses for my lapse in judgment and I accept my suspension.
“I love the fans, my teammates and this organization and my greatest punishment is knowing that I have let so many good people down. I promise to do everything possible to try and earn back the respect that I have lost.”
The direct impact on the Tigers is clear. Peralta was having a great season, providing 126 wRC+ (what’s wRC+?) and 3.7 WAR (what’s WAR?), essentially functioning as the team’s second best everyday hitter overall. The Tigers have baseball’s best offense and the loss of Peralta isn’t a crippling blow, but it certainly isn’t ideal. He’ll be replaced with defensive wizard Jose Iglesias who should be able to make up a decent amount of Peralta’s lost value with his defensive skills because we’re only talking about 50 games.
Now we know. The uncertainly surrounding his situation is over and we can get on with our lives. Peralta did something against the rules, it seems, and will take the punishment for that infraction. I’ve been outspoken about this issue over the last few months in saying that the evidence that has been made public is extremely flimsy, but hopefully we’ll be able to get a better idea of what MLB has on these players that resulted in these suspensions now that the reckoning has come. I’ll reserve full judgement on their character until everything is made public.
For now, I’ll say this. Jhonny Peralta broke the rules. He cheated. I don’t know what he took. I just know his actions were enough to result in a suspension from MLB. But we should remember that taking PEDs isn’t some sort of giant affront to the Gods. These aren’t players who harmed others, drove drunk, or did anything to endanger anyone. They didn’t steal or abuse. They cheated, but we’re talking about taking a drug to make yourself better at a sport. Let’s not lose our heads.
I don’t mean to sound like I’m defending Peralta. I’m not. He did something wrong and it will hurt his team. My team. But I don’t think he’s a bad guy because of it. I imagine a lot of fans, if given the chance to take an illegal drug that would turn them into superstar athletes, would hardly think twice.
The only reason I can guarantee you that I wouldn’t is because I’m terrified of side effects and would never be able to take PEDs without giving myself debilitating panic attacks. Aside from that, I understand the temptation.
I’m not sure how much PEDs help baseball players. It’s not really a game of strength. I imagine in helps, but I don’t think you can take a nobody and make him a star with a few injections. Maybe it turns a AAA guy into someone who sticks in the show, but that’s about it. Peralta deserves what he is getting, but the reaction to PED use is really disproportionate to the offense.
This is a sport that has no punishment for drunk driving. It’s a sport that glorified the long ball after the 1995 strike. I want PED users punished and I want these punishments to deter others. It’s good for baseball, and it’s especially good for young athletes who won’t damage their bodies taking dangerous drugs. I don’t want sports to be a chemically enhanced freak show, but where is the line? Countless pitchers have a ligament from their leg implanted into their elbow. What about cortisone?
We’ve created an atmosphere that is so competitive and so cutthroat that guys will do anything to get ahead. Millions of dollars are at stake. I know people are upset about the validity of records and the tradition of the game, but some of our most hallowed records were set in an era in which only white people were allowed to play the sport. Not everything is so sacred.
I guess my point is this. These guys are rule breakers. They’re not horrible criminals. They are people with flaws who sometimes give into temptation and skirt the rules to get ahead. That’s wrong, but we’re not talking about a deadly sin here. The problem is with us if we expect our stars to perfect. If we demand perfection, we are asking to be deceived.
Give these guys a break, They’ll do their time. They’ll take the hit. They’ll be tested and scrutinized more in the future. That’s on them. But spare me the moralizing. You’ve all done things that were less than honorable.
What actually gets me isn’t that Peralta cheated (and I honestly don’t care much about the rest of them). What gets me is that Peralta put the Tigers in this position. Maybe the drugs made him better, but they also put him at risk to miss 50 games and the team will miss him for those 50. They probably don’t need him, but they might. It’s not really like he quit on us, but it’s a little bit like that.
I’m mad at him, but I forgive him. And I understand, but I’m furious.
I really don’t know how I’m supposed to feel. I’m upset for the career minor leaguers who did it clean and can’t break in, but I’m also really envious that they were blessed with enough talent to make it that far. Peralta’s the bad guy, but he’s not a bad guy. He made a very human mistake, he apologized, and took full responsibility.
It really comes down to this. He shouldn’t have done it, but it’s not as bad as most people will make it out to be. I don’t know when it happened, but somewhere along the way I lost my innocence. It’s probably been eroding for a long time. But I don’t have it in me to get worked up about this. Professional athletes are guilty of so much worse, why bother drawing our lines in the sand on this one issue? Where was the outrage about players who got arrested for DUI? How about the players who committed violence against women? Heck, what about the players who get in fights on the field?
I guess what I’m saying is I’ve outgrown getting angry just for anger’s sake. BioGenesis has been more annoying than anything else. I want it to be over and I don’t really care what the outcome is. I want the focus to be on the field. Peralta is to blame for taking himself off the field, but that doesn’t mean we need to follow him around while he’s gone and call him names.
I don’t expect people to be perfect and I won’t fault them when I find out they’re not. Maybe I’ll feel differently in 10 years and I know I felt different 10 years ago, but this is just part of life you have to accept. People do bad things and if you get worked up about all of them you’ll miss all the good things people do. Yeah Peralta did something stupid, but instead of spending our time on that, why don’t we glorify someone who did something great?
That’s what I’ll be doing and I’d love it if you would join me.



















